March 13, 2007

Fired Prosecutors Were Asked to Help Fix Elections

Filed under: Politics — PolitiCalypso @ 8:24 am

I didn’t think I’d be writing two blogs in a day, but this is just unbelievable. Per the Washington Post: Firings Had Genesis in White House.

No, that’s not the unbelievable part. A more appropriate descriptor would be “expected.” Here’s what’s unbelievable:

Rove and other White House officials also forwarded complaints that U.S. attorneys were not doing enough to prosecute voter fraud.

Since the 2000 presidential election ended in dispute in Florida, Republicans have repeatedly raised concerns about possible voter fraud, alleging that convicted felons and other ineligible voters have been permitted to cast ballots to the benefit of Democrats.

Let’s ignore the fact that most complaints of fraud have been on the Democratic side and have involved election fraud rather than voter fraud, wherein the fraud takes place on the official side rather than the voter’s side. These election fraud complaints have alleged that (mostly) Republican officials have prevented low-income, minority, student, and other primarily Democratic voting groups from casting their votes. Another school of complaints alleges a conspiracy of deliberate incompetence on the part of election equipment companies; i.e., the companies peddle insecure equipment with no accountability, computers that would allow unscrupulous officials to meddle with the recorded results. There is documented and circumstantial evidence to support both claims on a wide scale.

However, there you have it on record: Karl Rove has been using federal prosecutors to cherry-pick specific complaints of election-related fraud that would benefit his party.

In fact, I’d go so far as to say that he’s been using the prosecutors to prevent legitimate voters from casting their ballots. As prosecutors it was their job to investigate crime, but a good prosecutor does not harass those who are innocent and does not conduct witch hunts based on information that he or she deems to be erroneous. These attorneys seem to be honorable people who took their jobs seriously. Karl Rove, who is anything but honorable, was asking them to abuse their power to investigate people who their own expertise and investigative work gave them reason to believe were innocent of this crime. And if they didn’t want to cooperate with his agenda, then, well, they got blacklisted. And eventually fired.

One firing definitely was related to these issues:

Iglesias, the New Mexico prosecutor, was not on that list. Justice officials said Sampson added him in October, based in part on complaints from Sen. Pete V. Domenici and other New Mexico Republicans that he was not prosecuting enough voter-fraud cases.

Would that be the same New Mexico with massive complaints of electronic voting machine shenanigans in 2004? Oh, and by the way, Iglesias is a Republican. He just wasn’t interested in abusing his position as a prosecutor to harass legitimate voters.

It’s now on record that Karl Rove has abused resources of the federal government, resources being paid for by taxpayers, to try to tamper with the electoral process. This is huge.

I cannot wait to see what else is brought out in these hearings.

January 25, 2007

The Ohio Recount Was Rigged

Filed under: Politics — PolitiCalypso @ 11:48 am

The recount of the ballots in Cuyahoga County, Ohio (which contains the city of Cleveland) was rigged, a court has concluded.

Leading up to the recount, the election workers were to do a count of a random sample of precincts. If the sample counts had discrepancies between machine and hand tallies, the entire county had to be counted by hand.

The elections officials deliberately selected precincts where they knew no errors in counting had occurred, and they were able to do a machine recount on equipment that is acknowledged to have at least a 2% error rate.

I had a feeling that this was going to be the verdict. They had these people admitting to what they did. It was just a matter of formality.

This is also just the tip of the iceberg of the 2004 Ohio recount. Such shenanigans were documented to have occurred all over the state, pretty much wherever they could get away with it. Laziness? Probably. Politics? Perhaps.

Something has to be done about this broken system that we have. Really, truly, done about it. I have about reached the point of opposing electronic voting in any form, and I’ve drafted designs for a full line of such systems. You can build all the security you want into a machine, but ultimately you have to give someone administrative power over the county’s equipment and ballots. These computerized systems are only as secure as the people you put in charge of them. This verdict and the Florida debacle in 2000 show just how secure that is.

It would be really nice if apathetic election officials across the country would just do us all a favor and step down. There are thousands of activists who care about the movement and would take their job very seriously.

October 26, 2006

Election Reform Advocate Within Margin of Error in FL Race

Filed under: Politics — PolitiCalypso @ 1:23 pm

Clint Curtis is a Florida computer programmer who in 2004 accused then-FL Statehouse member Tom Feeney of contracting him to build a vote-stealing program. He went under oath to make his assertion and passed a lie detector test as well.

He is running for Congress this year and is within 2 percentage points of overtaking now-Congressman Feeney in the 24th District of Florida.

From Electoral Vote:

In FL-24, on the central east coast of Florida, a Zogby poll puts Rep. Tom Feeney (R) and Clint Curtis (D) in a statistical tie. Feeney ran unopposed in 2004 because the Democrats regarded this heavily Republican district as hopeless.

The race is 45% Feeney – 43% Curtis according to the Zogby poll.

“Pattyp”‘s highly intriguing blog on the race makes reference in the comments to an internal campaign poll that shows her candidate leading Feeney by 10 points. It is absolutely astounding how, in a heavily Republican district, a candidate could run a highly competitive race against a person he had accused of asking him to rig the vote. Truly, it blows my mind. You’d think he would have been laughed out of town with demographics like that, but clearly that is not the case.

If Curtis wins this seat, the Democrats would already have won the House, and this would just be padding a majority. However, the biggest benefit is that the House would have obtained a strong advocate for voting systems reform, a person who truly understands the issue. Curtis undoubtedly would work with Rep. John Conyers, and we would see some real reform on that front come out of the House.

Curtis’s official website

September 12, 2006

Direct Evidence of 2004 Ohio Ballot Tampering Uncovered

Filed under: Politics — PolitiCalypso @ 4:50 pm

Dead horse? What dead horse?

For those of us who have long thought that the 2004 Ohio election was every bit as corrupt as the 2000 Florida election (if not more so), this is sweet.

Richard Hayes Phillips, statistician and now election reform advocate, in a legal declaration:

Having reviewed a substantial amount of forensic evidence, it is my conclusion that there is direct evidence of ballot tampering in each of the eleven counties whose public records I have examined, and that there is a compelling need to protect the evidence from destruction, presently scheduled to take place on or shortly after September 2, 2006. The Court should order all Boards of Elections to continue to preserve and protect all ballots, poll books, voter signature books, and associated records from the November 2, 2004 election until a suitable repository is found for their permanent preservation.

I will get to reading this later this week, and, hopefully, include some of what I glean from it in my election systems blog.

A little background: These ballots were scheduled to be destroyed earlier this month, but they will be preserved, thanks to these motions that were filed.

This is verrrry verrrry interesting.

Powered by WordPress. This theme is a heavy modification of the WordPress Classic theme planned to match the layout of ErinThead.com. Because of its very specific and personalized nature, it is not available for public download. Content copyright ©2005-2009.