August 2, 2011

Emily Organizes; Gulf Threat Decreases

Filed under: Forecasting,Tropical — Erin @ 7:42 pm

Tropical Storm Emily struggled through most of last night and today with disorganization, an aftereffect of its multivortex structure as an unnamed disturbance.  However, it has become better stacked today, with convection blowing up over its center.  It still has a long way to go, despite its more pleasing appearance in satellite photos.

Steering in the short term is straightforward.  Emily has been generally on the left side of the forecast track for most of the day, and it is now expected to make landfall in the Dominican Republic as a tropical storm.  Weaker systems generally weather the mountains better than stronger ones, provided that they do not linger in the area; therefore dissipation of the system seems comparatively unlikely.

 

Models conclude that trough will miss Emily

The models have largely converged on a scenario in which the trough that is to weaken the Bermuda High will be gone before it can force the full recurvature of Emily.  The ridge is expected to build back in, and the GFS shows the hurricane being trapped off the coast of Florida, unable to move ashore because of another ridge, stalling until a shortwave trough lifts it away.  The GFDL and HWRF models, which take their input from the GFS, both show a very close approach to the east coast of Florida, with the HWRF showing near-hurricane-force winds onshore.  The NOGAPS shows this same scenario without the stall.  In this scenario, a landfall on the Outer Banks of North Carolina occurs, followed by a pull up the Atlantic seaboard (offshore) and out to sea.

The Canadian model shows a very weak system, probably no more than a mild tropical storm, making landfall on the east coast of Florida and then being merged into the shortwave.  I should observe that the Canadian model now shows the first low strengthening to 988 mb at sea and reducing the Bermuda High to its winter stage (the Azores High), which does not seem remotely reasonable to me for an August system.  I am not putting a lot of faith in this aspect of the Canadian solution.

The European model also shows a “screwy” solution, amplifying the shortwave trough to 992 mb at sea, while completely dissipating Emily over Hispaniola.  Although unlikely in my opinion, dissipation of the tropical storm is certainly possible, as yesterday’s blog entry said, but I am having great difficulty believing that either of the baroclinic low pressure systems involved in this will reach 990 mb levels.  The first trough is currently located in New England producing a severe weather risk, and it is analyzed at 1002 mb.

Bottom line, I am giving a highly skeptical eye to anything that destroys the Bermuda High at the beginning of August and amplifies low pressure cores to winter levels, especially when they have not been doing this consistently.  Any land-free recurvature of Emily depends entirely on such “bombs,” and the approach to the East Coast will be so close that a weaker trough or shortwave will make all the difference in the world in what wind speeds are felt onshore and whether landfall occurs.

 

Gulf Coast threat decreases… for now

As should be apparent, the threat to the Gulf Coast states has decreased over the course of the day (with a caveat).  The current thinking is that the trough will lift Emily northward enough to miss an entrance into the Gulf of Mexico.  However, this could change if the storm stays south and west enough, or the trough is weaker than expected at sea.

August 1, 2011

Emily Is a Threat To the U.S.

Filed under: Forecasting,Tropical — Erin @ 8:20 pm

After days of teasing weather watchers (and the National Hurricane Center), a tropical wave in the Atlantic has formed into Tropical Storm Emily.  The storm is rather disorganized and not at all “attractive” in the tropical cyclone sense, an artifact of its having had multiple competing vortices for several days that prevented its consolidation into a single system.

Because of its delay in getting organized, Emily is a threat to the United States.  I am going to blog regularly about this system as long as that remains the case.

 

What’s the synoptic setup?

Emily is going to move mostly west, slightly WNW, along the southern end of the Bermuda High.  Its strength will depend primarily on possible land interaction during this time.  The National Hurricane Center forecasts an impact on the island of Hispaniola, which would weaken the system.  How much remains to be seen; many a major hurricane has been reduced to a tropical storm by this island, but some systems that are much weaker have survived passage.  It is terribly difficult to forecast how much effect the mountains will have on any particular storm.  A lot depends on how well-organized the system is when it reaches the island (I do not mean its intensity; intensity and cyclonic organization are not the same thing), how long it stays there, and whether there are any additional destructive factors such as dry air intrusion and wind shear that are hitting the storm at the same time.  It is arguable that there’s not a lot of point in making a forecast for Emily after its interaction with Hispaniola at all, because what happens to it after that will be heavily influenced by its strength at that point.  I’ll discuss the various possibilities, however.

The high is going to be weakened on its left flank by a trough coming off the Atlantic coast in a couple of days.  This should pull the storm to the north.  How much depends on how weak Emily is and how strong the trough has managed to become.  The stronger Emily is, the more northward it is expected to move, all things being equal with respect to the trough.  I think that the trough will be the most important player here, though, and should be watched at least as closely as the tropical system.  It is very uncommon to have a strong trough coming off the East Coast at the beginning of August, and there has been a pattern this year of the GFS (the U.S.’s long-range weather forecast model) overdoing the strength of lows in the days before they arrive.  I am not inclined to buy into a strong trough unless I see it materialize, but it’s always best not to count anything out, either.

Emily is probably too far south and west to have a land-free recurvature (“fish storm”) path.  It’s not impossible, but it is unlikely.  It simply took too long to develop for that to be the most likely track.

 

What’s the model spread?

Models generally have clustered around the state of Florida as of Monday evening, with the NOGAPS (U.S. Navy model) farthest west and the GFDL farthest east.  The NOGAPS is showing an implied strike on the Florida panhandle (it has Emily stalling in the Gulf and not making final landfall within a 7-day period), and the GFDL shows a “fish storm” recurvature.  It is important to observe that this trend for the GFDL is relatively new; until the past 24 hours or so, that model was showing a strike on the East Coast of Florida and the HWRF model was showing a recurvature.  Now that has reversed itself.  In the meantime, the NOGAPS has been consistent in its Gulf track.  Consistency alone is not a reason to support a model’s output, but it is generally indicative of a model’s having a better grip on the environment than one that is prone to the “windshield wiper effect.”

 

Is the Gulf Coast at risk?

Short answer:  yes, but it’s not set in stone.  As of now, I still would say that the Florida peninsula is most likely to get hit, but the Gulf is a definite possibility, especially if Emily is weakened by interaction with land and/or the trough is weak.

Several forecasts indicate that the storm will remain weak for long enough to stay south and get into the Gulf of Mexico before making the recurvature.  This is not a fluke, or a one-off from some model; it has been a solution for the NOGAPS, Canadian, and UK several times over the past two days.  Furthermore, models such as the HWRF have been hinting at a Florida East Coast strike at a perpendicular angle, indicating a strengthening ridge that would force Emily westward again.  While these models do not go out far enough yet to indicate what would become of Emily after the Florida strike, entry into the Gulf (in a weakened state) is certainly possible in this scenario.

 

July 23, 2011

90L: Weak and Into the Gulf

Filed under: Forecasting,Tropical — Erin @ 8:18 pm

The area of interest in the Atlantic, 90L, has become more likely to enter the Gulf of Mexico.  After a time yesterday when it was trying to spin up, the system has stayed weak and is now beginning to encounter land.  This land interaction will keep 90L weak as it passes through the Caribbean, making it even more likely to avoid the weakness in the Bermuda High that will be created by a trough.  90L currently has an area of moderate 700 mb to 850 mb vorticity associated with its convection.  This area of vorticity is what currently passes for a circulation.

It is important to note that, even though the current state of the system is less organized than yesterday and the National Hurricane Center has lowered its percentage of becoming a tropical cyclone in the next 48 hours (which I would completely agree with), 90L has gained additional model support for its long-term development prospects.  The cyclone-specific HWRF model was on board with 90L yesterday, taking it just south of Cuba and bringing it to 60 mph by the time it passes by.  Today the HWRF keeps the system even farther south, intensifies 90L to a Category 1 hurricane, and sends it into the Yucatan.  Additionally, the GFDL cyclone model, which was not doing anything at all with 90L yesterday, is today showing a Category 2 hurricane striking the Yucatan.  I think that is overdoing it, personally, but this system is showing indications of going into the Gulf of Mexico and intensifying then.

In recent hours, it has become possible that 90L is experiencing a center reformation.  The center has been located in the part of the system that is now south of Puerto Rico.  However, increased convection just south of Hispaniola (Fig. 1) is changing the polarity of the system, as is evident in upper-level divergence charts (Fig. 2).  This convection is likely associated with the mountains and therefore does not indicate improvement in the tropical structure of 90L.  However, if the center reforms to the northwest, this will throw a great deal of uncertainty into even the survival of 90L, as it will come much closer to the destructive mountains of Hispaniola and Cuba.  If the reformation does not occur, we are looking at a track like that of the GFDL and HWRF.  For my part, I am finding it hard to get on board with a center reformation over a more destructive environment that will make it hard for existing centers to stay together, let alone new ones to form, but time will tell.

One more important point to note for the GFDL model run is the strong ridge that would, in that scenario, serve to block 90L from moving north after it enters the Gulf.  The blocking ridge does not extend that far west in the HWRF run, making a Central Gulf landfall possible.

In summary:  90L is in a state of transition at present, and the outcome of a number of possibilities will determine its fate.  If the center reforms to the northwest, the GFDL and HWRF tracks should not be considered because they assume the present center.  The result of a reformation would be more land interaction, which means a weak system, delays in development, and the possibility of complete dissipation.  If the center does not reform, the GFDL and HWRF scenarios are in play, opening the doors for a significantly stronger system (and it should be noted that those models only go out to 126 hours, and have the system as an organized hurricane or near-hurricane in the middle of 90°F waters and low shear).  The ultimate landfalling location of 90L will then depend on the strength and extent of the ridge.


Figure 1: Rainbow-enhanced infrared image of 90L, Saturday evening.


Figure 2: Upper-level divergence over 90L.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress. This theme is a heavy modification of the WordPress Classic theme planned to match the layout of ErinThead.com. Because of its very specific and personalized nature, it is not available for public download. Content copyright ©2005-2015.